A new study by the University of Texas Veterinary School found that nearly all of the more than 700 veterinary practices across the country that offer online veterinary services don’t have any formal training in the field.

The study, conducted in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, examined more than 300 online veterinary clinics in 26 states.

While online veterinary practices offer a variety of services, they are often poorly trained, and the lack of training can lead to poor patient care and a shortage of primary care staff, said Dr. Sarah B. Mink, a veterinary assistant professor in the School of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health and the study’s lead author.

Many online veterinary practitioners do not have enough training and can’t provide the type of patient care needed by the specialty, she said.

While a number of online veterinary programs, including Petcare, are not required to have an accredited veterinary residency, many do have residency requirements, including a bachelor’s degree in veterinary medicine or surgery and the ability to practice in an accredited hospital.

Some of the top performing online veterinary care providers in the country were those that had not even completed their primary residency training, such as Petcare of Houston and Petsmart of Fort Worth, Texas, the study said.

Petcare of Texas, for example, has a five-year online residency requirement but only has about 40 residents.

It has more than 2,000 online residents, and has fewer than 30 online veterinary technicians, the report found.

The Petcare website is designed to provide pet owners with information about their pets, and many of its services are available online, such the online veterinarian directory.

Pet owners can choose from a list of recommended veterinarians, who can answer questions about their animals and offer free advice.

But many of the clinics lack adequate training in how to safely and effectively care for their pets.

“Many of these facilities do not provide proper care for pet owners,” Mink said.

Some pet owners who visit online veterinary offices have had to pay more than $10,000 in veterinary bills.

That’s more than the cost of an average pet’s annual care, according to the U,S.


More than 2.2 million Americans had a pet in the last year, according a recent report by the U of T.

The U of S, however, did not examine the extent to which veterinarians use the internet to help people with their pets — the report said.

Mink said the online community is a place for pet lovers to find and connect with others who are in the same situation.

It’s a great way to share information and connect to people, she added.

Pet Care of Houston, for instance, was ranked second in online veterinary rankings for its customer service, Mink noted.

It is not the only pet care provider to do well online.

A number of large online veterinary companies have also achieved high rankings, according the U’s study.

The online veterinary community has also been growing in recent years, said Jennifer P. Buss, president of the Texas Association of Veterinary Specialists, which represents more than 3,000 veterinarians and veterinary technicians.

The Austin-based association has about 1,700 members.

The Texas Association for Pet Health has about 4,400 members.

In the last six years, the number of veterinary students in Texas has increased from 8 to 15 percent, she noted.

Petsmart of Dallas, for its part, has grown from 250 to about 1.3,000 members, with its online veterinary program serving about 1 million people, Buss said.

Other top online veterinary schools in the U., including PetCare of Chicago and Petsmark, have also seen their numbers grow, she continued.

While the internet is a great platform for learning, it can also be a poor place for those who do not possess the necessary training, said Mink.

PetCare of Houston is one of those online veterinary providers, but Buss noted that most of the online programs don’t offer veterinary training for the more advanced degrees.

“You really have to be a vet to do that,” she said, adding that the only reason some people are getting the online training is because they can afford it.

Buss added that while it’s important for people to learn the basics of veterinary care, the majority of veterinary professionals are trained in the traditional, manual manner, and don’t need online training to provide effective care.

“I think we’re just going to have to continue to expand the role of veterinary education in veterinary schools,” she added, “because I think there’s just not enough information out there.”

Buss, who is also president of a nonprofit organization called the American Veterinary Medical Association, said online veterinary education has the potential to transform veterinary care in the future.

“It’s an exciting time,” she noted, “but we’re still at the beginning of the evolution.”

Contact the writer: [email protected]